Innovative Pay Methods: Addressing Compensation Challenges in the Construction Sector in South Sudan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajebi.v4i3.5343Keywords:
Compensation, Construction, Innovative, Methods, Pay, SectorAbstract
The protracted civil conflict in South Sudan has significantly impeded the development of infrastructure, particularly the road system, which remains inadequate or nonexistent in many rural areas where 80% of the population resides. Among the many difficulties faced by construction companies include material delivery delays, a shortage of local skilled labor, disruptions during the rainy season, insecurity, delayed project approvals and payments, and a large number of public holidays. Furthermore, culturally motivated employee procrastination has a detrimental impact on output. Employee pay usually does not take these difficulties into consideration, which affects business performance. The purpose of this study was to suggest innovative payment strategies suited to the unique construction environment of South Sudan. The study employed a mixed-methods approach. Data was collected from eight project locations via questionnaires, interviews, and workshops. SPSS and qualitative content analysis were used to analyze the data. Three successful pay models were found: Management-Driven Pay (MDP), Shared Pay Rate (SPR), and Team-Based Pay (TBP). These strategies seek to match incentives with actual problems that exist on the ground, such as security and weather. To encourage better labor relations in the industry, the report suggests modifying the Labor Act of 1997.
Downloads
References
Ali, R., & Kamau, J. (2021). Challenges of compensation systems in post-conflict construction environments: A case study of East Africa. Journal of Construction Management and Economics, 39(4), 225–239.
Bawole, J. N., Osei-Kyei, R., & Chan, A. P. C. (2021). Compensation strategies and labor motivation in conflict-prone construction zones. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(12), 2450–2472.
Gollin, D. (2019). Infrastructure gaps and labor market dynamics in fragile states. African Development Review, 31(S1), 76–89.
Greene, J., Hibbard, J. H., & Overton, V. (2014). A case study of a team-based, quality-focused compensation model for primary care providers. Medical Care Research and Review, 71(3), 207–223.
Hackman, J. R. (2002). Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances. Harvard Business Press.
International Labour Organization. (2018). Employment and decent work in situations of fragility, conflict and disaster. ILO.
Kim, H., Sutton, K. L., & Gong, Y. (2011). Group-based pay-for-performance plans and firm performance: The moderating role of empowerment practices. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30, 31–52.
Lawler, E. E. (1990). Strategic pay. Jossey-Bass.
Merriman, K. K. (2009). On the folly of rewarding team performance while hoping for teamwork. Compensation & Benefits Review, 41(3), 61–67.
Meyer, C. (1994). How the right measures help teams to excel in performance measurement. Harvard Business Review, 72(3), 95–103.
Mulvaney, M. A., McKinney, W. R., & Grodsky, R. (2013). The development of a pay-for-performance appraisal system for municipal agencies: A case study. Public Personnel Management, 41(3), 505–533.
Mundial, B. (2017). Infrastructure for resilience: A framework for fragile and conflict-affected countries (World Bank Policy Paper Series, No. 98234). World Bank.
Ndegwa, P. (2022). Innovative compensation models in unstable construction environments: Lessons from South Sudan. African Journal of Labor and Industrial Relations, 14(2), 55–70.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jackline Benjamin Libo Warille

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.